Nobody ever had the education or the courage to tell the truth.

The Muslims invaded India, destroyed the Hindu temples, killed the Hindus in the millions and raped their women, but still we had Gandhi, a national leader (National father to some cowardice  Hindus), who wanted Hindu Muslim Bhai Bhai. To get a Muslim Pakistan after the British would leave, the Muslims killed the Hindus and the Sikhs, GOT THEIR Pakistan, but the DEVIL Hindus did not want an exchange of population. The Muslim got Pakistan and then killed and drove away the Hindus and Sikhs from West Pakistan and the Hindus from East Pakistan. The non-Muslims living in areas to become Pakistan were offered  by BI Sexual Gandhi/Maulana Nehu  to Allah as sacrificial goats. Even during Bangladesh freedom fight in 1971, the West Pakistani soldiers killed some of the Muslim leaders but killed over 800,000 Hindus, who had no role in the freedom, but just for the pleasure of killing the Kafirs. But NO DEVIL on earth talks about it as if Hindu life is no more valuable than garbage.. And even  US President Nixon blindly supported Pakistan and ignored this genocide.

Our misguided selfish politicians  Advani sacrificing great chief Minister Sri Kalyan Singh of Hindus Vedic bold tradition broke a few stones of a discarded Babri Mosque and no Muslim was hurt, but the Muslim world roared and 3,000 Hindus of Mumbai were killed by the Indian Muslims. And that was nothing to the STUPID News media.

No non-Muslim living in West Pakistan or in Babgladesh  today  can dare to utter a word  about their plight but are living in fear every day. But the Muslims of India, who demanded Pakistan and killed the Hindus in the thousands stayed on and were enjoying DEVIL Nehru's SECULARISM and they burned 58 Hindu pilgrims in a train in Godhra. If the Hindus had even a trace of the Muslim manhood, then Millions and Millions of the Muslims would be killed and driven out to Pakistan, where they belonged. In utter pain some Hindus killed a few Muslims (about a thousand) and drove some from their homes, but the Muslims also killed many Hindus. And the DEVIL CNN and the many Hindus blamed Mr. Modi for not stopping the Hindus. It makes me sick to see how the cowardly Hindus cannot unite and drive the Muslims out of India. The Hindus who can call that devil Gandhi, a Mahatma and father of India, really deserve what they have been receiving from the Muslims. The Hindu leaders, mostly from the upper castes are proud of their Vedas and Geeta and cannot go out, embrace every low caste Hindu and make a united and powerful Hindu India and keep the Muslims the way the Hindus were kept, killed and driven away. How could these upper caste leaders let an Italian Catholic widow rule India? In the biological struggle for survival, your Hinduism or Vedas are useless. Fight or die but do not cry like cowards. Many of you hate me but only I wrote how we may unite and make India a strong and rich Hindu Nation.

Let us have an introspection upon the prevailing maladies and get the effective implementation of the better idea, the better measurements as to prevent them by the strong will power in order to protect the half of the human being which constituted the part of the women folk in the society. Yogesh Kumar Saxena, Advocate, High Court Allahabad (India) e mail Address yogrekha@yahoo.co.in or yogrekha@rediffmail.com  Phone:- 91/ 0532/637720/2436451

women constitutes a neglected section of society in civilised world, shame to Hindus Muslims

In social field, the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 took a step of abolishing poly gamy amongst Hindus. The provision in Cr.P.C. u/s 125 for getting maintenance, amendment u/s 376 I.P.C. and the promulgation of the provision of Dowry death r/w section 113-B of the Evidence Act has provided the substantial measurements for the eradication of prevailing maladies of oppression upon the women. The Hindu adoptions and maintenance Act, 1956, the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 provided a substantial degree to remove the disabilities of Hindu women. The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 was passed with an ostensible idea of checking the evil. The practice of dowry has emerged as a major social evil, which is reflected in large number of cases of "Dowry Deaths". The reluctance of parents of the victim to lodge a report is the reason for this personal nature of the crime.

Women by and large constitute a neglected section of the society. There is now indisputable evidence of steady decline in the value of women in society. The following trends may be responsible in this context: - (1) excessive morality amongst women and female child. (2) glaring disparity between men and women in access to medical services (3) Persistent decline in sex ratio. (4) Illiteracy and unemployment of women.  Dowry is a clear Affirmation of the fact that one’s gender determines one’s worth or significance. Since worth is distributed unequally amongst the sexes at birth, worth deficiency amongst females can be offset by material additives.

Dowry is the most prominent additive. In the survey of the cases of unnatural deaths of young women, this hypothesis suggested itself again and again. Brides who earn more that their husbands are made to feel an obligation to supply ‘dowry goods and services’ long after their marriage, just as those women who earn nothing. Society perceives woman as economically less productive than man (or unproductive) and, therefore, a female is regarded as a net economic drain on a family. At marriage, when the female is in transit between the two households, the family that accepts her is perceived to be saddled with a net economic liability, while the household that is losing her is in fact losing a liability. Dowry is, therefore, a compensatory payment to the family, which agrees to shelter her, hypothetically for the rest of her life. And precisely for this reason, dowry is a recurring phenomenon, which lasts a lifetime.

In Air India Vs, Nargesh Meerau (1981) 4 SCC 335, an Air hostesses case, according to regulation 46 and 47, the air hostesses shall retire on following contingencies (1) on attaining age of 35 years (2) on marriage, if it took place within four years of service (3) on first pregnancy. On other hand, Assistant Flight persons were retiring at the age of 55 or 58 years. Both categories continued the same cabin crew. The Apex court observed that compelling the air hostess not to have any children and thus interfere with and diverts the ordinary course of human action. The Apex court observed that this provision is not only manifestly unreasonable and arbitrary, but contains the quality of unfairness and exhibits " naked despotism" and therefore violative of Article 14. There are vide variety of women employees i.e. (1) small segment in workforce as executives and prestigious professionals (2) semi professionals like nurses, school teachers who are hired not only for their skills and intelligence, but presumably for their looks too. (3) The lowest economic stratum, predominantly illiterate semi literate. We have to see that (1) whether there are set of laws which meaningfully deals with the stresses and strains faced by women in workforce (2) Do existing law discriminate in any way against those women? (3) are the existing law comprehensive enough to protect the interest of women ? (4) What are the special steps required to meet the specific disabilities faced by women (5) Is there the need for special laws to meet the disabilities faced by women. Laws, as we know, are only regulatory and not curative and had this not been so. Nothing would have been easier for us and to make laws against all social evils and find the next morning that our society has become heaven. The eradication of an evil lies not so much in law as in the society itself. No society can exists, breathe and move without a base and this base is provided by norms and values.

Mother Women, Sex Selection Female Foeticide And Domestic Violence creation

The doctor mother and her twin daughters were thrown out of their home in West Delhi. New Delhi: Her doctor husband forced Ritu Kumar, a physician herself, to go for a sex determination test and her academician in-laws pushed her to abort the two female foetuses inside her or at least kill one of them. But she still went ahead and gave birth to twin girls.That was two-and-a-half years back. Ritu (name changed) and the twins were thrown out of their home in west Delhi. But the fight that began with two unborn children is far from over. "I am facing a lot of hardships. My husband has thrown me out of home. But still I am proud of what I have done. I am proud to have saved my daughters," said Ritu, who lives in the national capital. Nearly one million female foetuses are aborted every year in India — a country known for its male preference — which means over 2,700 girls die every day before even seeing the light of day. But thanks to Ritu, at least two girls have got a chance to live. Ritu got married in 2004. Both she and her husband are doctors and her in-laws are well-educated. "We came to know that I was carrying twin babies. Then my mother-in-law started demanding sex determination. They got that done by force. Then they started demanding that I get an MTP (medical termination of pregnancy). They asked me many times to at least get one child killed in utero," Ritu, 33, says. Ritu alleges that her mother-in-law told her that "two daughters would be a big burden on them". She accuses her husband of verbally abusing her and claims that she was virtually put under house arrest when she decided to disobey their diktat on the female foetuses. Now she is living with her 72-year-old father, who is also a doctor, along with her children. "I am living only because of my daughters," said Ritu, her eyes brimming with tears. But she often feels scared. "I am scared! They want to kill me. They have deployed detectives to record my activities. But, for the sake of my children, I have not filed a police case against my husband and my in-laws," she said.  "I have informed the Delhi Commission for Women and taken legal counselling from a high court lawyer. I have also availed myself of counselling from the Navjyoti Counselling Centre of Kiran Bedi. "But I have requested all of them not to initiate action against my husband and in-laws. I want to give my husband another chance as my children need their father," Kumar says.  Pragya Routray, a high court lawyer in Delhi, who has counselled Ritu and her husband, said: "It's a serious case. Her husband can be charged with forced sex selection, pressurizing her to go for female foeticide and, above all, domestic violence.